PCB panelisation calculator
How many boards of your outline fit on one panel, how large that panel becomes, and how much of its area stays unused. The arithmetic runs in your browser. Nothing is transmitted, nothing is stored and nothing is asked of you.
The same physics and the same search as in the PCBoffer costing, checked against 720 cases from the calculation core.
Your individual board
With an order size the calculator picks the panel with the fewest runs. Without one, the largest admissible panel.
Result
9 columns by 11 rows, 5.0 mm frame rail, to scale.
Two ways on from here
You design the board
The KiCad plugin reads your board straight out of the design, with no Gerber export in between. Outline, layer stack-up and bill of materials come from the same file.
To the KiCad pluginYou build the assembly
What the waste means in euros depends on your machine park, your set-up times and the order size. That is exactly what PCBoffer calculates, per process step and with a reason attached to every figure.
To EMS cost calculationWhat does this waste cost at your order size?
On the reference board bsp4 there are 26.4 per cent of manufacturing cost between the worst and the best panel: 988 pieces need 247 runs on a four-up panel and cost 705.63 euros, against 13 runs and 558.30 euros on an 81-up panel. The difference is not in the material, it is in the runs.
Ask for figures for your own plantWhat a panel is, and why it exists
A panel is a manufacturing sheet carrying several identical boards side by side, held by a frame and separated by scored lines or routed slots with mouse-bite tabs. They are broken out only after assembly.
The reason is a machine limit, not material yield
The conveyor of an assembly line accepts a board only from 50 mm edge length upwards. A board of 25 x 18 mm fits no placement machine. Without a panel the placement step drops out of the process chain, and what remains looks cheaper in the costing because the most expensive step is missing. So the panel is what first creates an assembly that can be built by machine at all.
How large the panel may become is calculated, not chosen
The panel rests on two conveyor rails and sags under its own weight. Past a certain sag the placement nozzle misses the pad and the stencil no longer seals during solder paste printing. The limit here is 0.5 mm, computed freely supported and without support pins, which is the cautious reading.
The copper carries its share
Two 35 µm layers on a 1.6 mm board carry 23.5 per cent of the flexural rigidity. An outer layer enters with the cube of its distance from the mid-plane, which is why the layer count is not a side figure in this calculation.
Every separation line weakens the panel, and by differing amounts
A scored groove cuts through the copper and leaves about a third of the board thickness standing. A routed slot is bridged by mouse-bite tabs, which are perforated and therefore carry only 37.5 per cent of their nominal width. Which method is weaker follows from the grid, not from the method: with many rows the scored line is weaker, with a single column the order reverses. A separation line counts most at mid-span and not at all over the support.
How this tool calculates
Flexural rigidity of the stack-up
From board thickness, layer count and copper thickness, separately for the warp and fill direction of the glass weave (22.0 and 18.5 GPa).
Areal mass and load
Bare board plus components, the latter as a flat factor of 1.2 on the weight of the bare board.
Longest free span
How far the panel may span before the admissible sag is reached. That is the upper bound for an uncut panel.
Grid search with separation lines
Every possible grid is evaluated, including the weakening at each separation line at its actual position in the span.
What this tool does not say
- It calculates no cost. What a run costs depends on your machines, set-up times and hourly rates.
- It does not optimise the raw format at the PCB fabricator, it optimises the panel that runs through the assembly line.
- Separating the panel is not priced. Scoring and routing are done by the PCB fabricator, not by the assembler.
- The sag is computed freely supported. With support pins in the machine a panel carries more than shown here.
- The preset panel formats come from published figures of PCB fabricators, not from any particular supplier.
Where the calculation comes from
The panel you see here comes from the same formulas and the same search PCBoffer goes on to calculate with. Computed with the costing's frame model, the default setting with no rotation and no given panel yields the same rows and columns. This calculator reads the frame rail as the frame left standing in production: with routing the slot is added on the outside between board and frame, with V-scoring the panel size stays the same. Because a larger panel sags more, the search then picks, with routing, the grid that can actually run on that panel. A second difference concerns the order size: a 1 means one board here and yields the smallest admissible panel; in a quote the same 1 counts as "not stated" and yields the largest. What PCBoffer adds beyond that is the money question: which panel needs the fewest runs, what a run costs in your plant, and which figure may go into a quote.
Free: PCB trace width calculator to IPC-2221
Track width for a current, wave impedance for microstrip and stripline, number of vias. No account, computed in the browser.
Size a trackFrequently asked questions
- What is PCB panelisation?
- A panel is a manufacturing sheet carrying several identical boards side by side, held by a frame and separated by scored lines or routed slots with mouse-bite tabs. The whole panel is placed and soldered as one part; the boards are broken out afterwards. The panel is therefore the assembly the machine sees, while the single board is what the customer receives.
- Why does a small board have to be panelised at all?
- Because the conveyor of an assembly line accepts a board only from 50 mm edge length upwards. A board of 25 x 18 mm fits no placement machine. Without a panel the placement step drops out of the process chain, and the remaining chain looks cheaper in the costing because the most expensive step is missing from it. Panelisation is therefore not a packaging question but the condition for building the assembly by machine at all.
- How large may a panel become?
- As large as the sag allows. The panel rests on two conveyor rails and sags under its own weight; past a certain sag the placement nozzle misses the pad and the stencil no longer seals during solder paste printing. The limit here is 0.5 mm, computed freely supported. In practice this limit binds before the machine window almost every time: a 20 x 15 mm board on 1.55 mm reaches a panel of about 250 mm, while the conveyor would accept up to 460 mm.
- V-scoring or routing with mouse-bite tabs: which carries more?
- That follows from the grid, not from the method. A scored groove cuts through the copper and leaves about a third of the board thickness standing, which on 1.55 mm with two 35 µm layers amounts to 2.99 per cent of the flexural rigidity. A routed slot is bridged by mouse-bite tabs, which are perforated and carry only 37.5 per cent of their nominal width, plus the two frame rails. With many rows the scored line is the weaker section; with a single column the relation reverses.
- How much money rides on the choice of panel?
- On the reference board bsp4, calculated with a shipped machine park: 988 pieces need 247 runs on a four-up panel and cost 705.63 euros, against 13 runs and 558.30 euros on an 81-up panel. That is 26.4 per cent on the same order. The reason is not material but runs: printing, reflow, handling and inspection are billed per run, and only placement per board.
- Does this tool calculate the same as PCBoffer?
- The physics and the search are the same: sag, rigidity, machine window and the ranking of panels come from the same model PCBoffer uses. A check run recomputes 720 cases from the calculation core on every change, rows and columns with zero deviation, computed with the costing's frame model. On top come hand-calculated cases for rotation, a given panel size, a single board and a grid that fills the panel exactly. This calculator reads the frame rail as the frame left standing in production: with routing the slot is added on the outside between board and frame, with V-scoring the panel size stays the same. Because a larger panel sags more, the search then picks, with routing, the grid that can actually run on that panel. The second difference concerns the order size: a 1 means one board here, and the calculator looks for the smallest admissible panel. In PCBoffer the same 1 means "not stated", because an interface supplies it as a default value; there the answer would be the largest admissible panel. What PCBoffer adds beyond it is the costing: which panel needs the fewest runs, what a run costs in a specific plant, and which figure may go into a quote.
- Does this apply to the fabrication panel at the PCB fabricator?
- Only in part, and the distinction matters. An assembly panel runs through the line, where the machine window and the sag limit apply. A fabrication panel, 18 x 24 inches for instance, is the fabricator's raw format and is never assembled as a whole; it is cut into assembly panels at the fabricator. A 610 mm fabrication panel of 1.55 mm FR4 sags around 22 mm when freely supported. For a given panel the calculator states the number of boards and reports sag and window as findings instead of rejecting the sheet.
- What does the calculator cost, and what happens to my inputs?
- It costs nothing and asks for no sign-up. The arithmetic runs entirely in your browser, no input is sent to a server and nothing is stored. The reason is simple: this calculator causes no cost per use, while a bill-of-materials analysis costs real money in compute per run. The inputs live in the address bar so a particular result can be passed on.
See PCBoffer in action: book a demo
30 minutes with founder Dr. Josip Strutz, on your own bill of materials: what PCBoffer calculates from it and where it takes work off your hands.
- 30-minute live session via Google Meet
- Tailored to your parts and your BOM
- No commitment required
Google Meet demo
Google Calendar